Education, Brain Drain, UK and Macedonia


I have received this information from someone I know, and I feel it is important to share:

“I earned my Master of Engineering (MEng) in Civil Engineering from City University of London – one of the leading universities in the United Kingdom. My integrated master’s degree is fully aligned with the Bologna Process and the European Qualifications Framework (EQF Level 7), combining both BSc and MSc studies.

After several years of studying and working in London, I returned to Macedonia with a clear goal: to build a family and contribute to the development of my country. My experience in designing, auditing, and supervising bridges, highways, and railways is directly applicable to the major infrastructure projects planned in Macedonia.

However, without a recognized degree, I cannot formally participate in these projects.

The Ministry of Education and Science rejected my degree, claiming that it “does not have enough credits.” This decision contradicts the National Qualifications Framework (NQF), which clearly states that an MEng degree corresponds to Level 7A – master’s level. The Ministry incorrectly applied a regulation meant only for domestic programs, completely disregarding European standards and its own laws.

In other words, the state that claims to fight against “brain drain” is, in practice, turning away those who want to return and work at home.

I am not asking for special treatment – I am asking for fairness and respect for the law, as well as for the international conventions Macedonia has signed.

A public hearing is scheduled at the Administrative Court in Skopje on 20 November 2025. I therefore urge all media outlets and individuals who believe this issue deserves attention to follow the process and help ensure that the voice of reason is heard.

Because every time Macedonia rejects someone who wants to return, it loses more than a person – it loses an opportunity for progress.”

The timing of this issue is particularly crucial. With the recent Macedonia–UK agreement now signed, more should be done to strengthen ties and encourage collaboration between the two countries. Instead of embracing the chance to attract skilled professionals who can contribute to development at home, outdated rules continue to block their participation. This sends a discouraging message to anyone who is planning to go back and undermines the spirit of partnership that both nations are trying to foster.

KM